Bentham vs Mill – Classical vs Qualitative Utilitarianism
UPSC PSIR | Western Political Thought | Ultra Comparative Page
1️⃣ CORE PRINCIPLE
Both thinkers accept:
“Greatest happiness of the greatest number.”
But they interpret happiness differently.
2️⃣ COMPARATIVE TABLE
| Dimension | Jeremy Bentham | J.S. Mill |
|---|---|---|
| Nature of Pleasure | Quantitative | Qualitative |
| Measurement | Hedonic Calculus | No strict measurement |
| View on Rights | Rights are legal constructs | Liberty essential for development |
| Individual Liberty | Secondary to utility | Protected through Harm Principle |
| Majority Rule | Utility-driven majority logic | Warns against tyranny of majority |
| Focus | Legal reform | Individuality & moral progress |
3️⃣ PHILOSOPHICAL SHIFT
- Bentham → Scientific hedonism
- Mill → Moral liberalism
Mill humanizes Bentham.
4️⃣ CRITICAL ANALYSIS
Bentham’s Problem:
- Ignores minority rights
- Purely mechanical calculation
Mill’s Problem:
- Who decides higher pleasures?
- Still based on utility logic
5️⃣ MODERN RELEVANCE
- Public policy evaluation
- Cost-benefit analysis
- Welfare economics
- Free speech debates
6️⃣ 20-MARK ANSWER STRUCTURE
Introduction: Utilitarianism as consequentialist moral theory.
Body: Compare quantitative vs qualitative pleasure.
Critical Insight: Rights vs Utility tension.
Conclusion: Mill refines Bentham by integrating liberty.
FINAL MEMORY CODE
- Bentham = Quantity
- Mill = Quality + Liberty
Utilitarianism evolves from calculation to liberty.
Shaktimatha Learning – Political Theory Master Series
No comments:
Post a Comment