UPSC Public Administration – Complete Ultimate Digital Library | Shaktimatha Learning

 

Advanced 20-Mark Series – Answer 14
Crisis of Parliamentary Oversight

---

 Question

“The expansion of the administrative state has weakened effective parliamentary oversight.” Critically examine.

---

📝 Advanced 20-Mark Model Answer

Parliamentary oversight is central to democratic accountability, ensuring that the executive and administrative agencies remain answerable to elected representatives. Mechanisms such as Question Hour, debates, budget scrutiny, and committee systems are designed to enforce accountability.

However, the rapid expansion of the administrative state, growth of delegated legislation, and proliferation of regulatory agencies have complicated traditional oversight structures.

Delegated legislation allows executive bodies to frame detailed rules beyond direct parliamentary debate. While necessary for administrative flexibility, it reduces direct legislative scrutiny.

Additionally, increasing complexity of governance, limited parliamentary time, and partisan politics often weaken substantive discussion and monitoring.

In India, parliamentary committees such as the Public Accounts Committee and Estimates Committee attempt detailed scrutiny, yet implementation of recommendations may be inconsistent.

The rise of digital governance and independent regulatory bodies further diffuses accountability channels.

Thus, while parliamentary oversight remains constitutionally strong, operational challenges create accountability gaps. Strengthening committee systems, enhancing transparency, and institutionalizing regular review mechanisms are essential to preserve democratic control.

---

Prepared by Shaktimatha Learning
Delegation + Administrative Expansion + Oversight Reform = 18+/20 Analytical Value